I've often wondered that too, I have a feeling that because its set just before the war that maybe he was a casualty of it
He was a good character and he would have been great in Last of, has would Ivy's mate ( Can't remember her name off hand) but she would have been good in the later ones too.
I suppose there had to be some differant characters in the First Of just to make it a bit differant.
I still think it was a shame that FOTSW did not continue. It was just beginning to take shape as did LOTSW after a few episodes.
I've often wondered that too, I have a feeling that because its set just before the war that maybe he was a casualty of it
He was a good character and he would have been great in Last of, has would Ivy's mate ( Can't remember her name off hand) but she would have been good in the later ones too.
I suppose there had to be some differant characters in the First Of just to make it a bit differant.
Think it was Dilys?
I still think it was a shame that FOTSW did not continue. It was just beginning to take shape as did LOTSW after a few episodes.
Problem was that within a few months the time would have moved on to war time properly and the characters would have been dispersed, Seymour to RAF and so on, Wally on the LNER as a reserved occupation, possibly and so on.
The story line would have changed dramatically.
Incidentally the suggestion in the pilot was that Clegg married in the early 1930s (height of depression) and thus would have been about five years older than he was in FOTSW.
And don't forget that Alan J W Bell didn't direct FOTSW. I doubt if he would have allowed any references to the past from that show.
And don't forget that Alan J W Bell didn't direct FOTSW. I doubt if he would have allowed any references to the past from that show.
I know Alan Bell somewhat resented not getting to direct FOTSW but we must not forget that we are talking about Roy Clarke's creation. I think it more likely he did not see a place in LOTSW for Sherbert. We must remember that by the time of FOTSW (in the Seymour era) LOTSW was well established. To bring in Sherbert might have spoiled the dynamic of the trio. And, I suggest it might have been very different if we had not had Foggy's return. I could see the character of Sherbert fitting in far better with a continuing Seymour third man but not with a returning Foggy.
And don't forget that Alan J W Bell didn't direct FOTSW. I doubt if he would have allowed any references to the past from that show.
I know Alan Bell somewhat resented not getting to direct FOTSW but we must not forget that we are talking about Roy Clarke's creation. I think it more likely he did not see a place in LOTSW for Sherbert. We must remember that by the time of FOTSW (in the Seymour era) LOTSW was well established. To bring in Sherbert might have spoiled the dynamic of the trio. And, I suggest it might have been very different if we had not had Foggy's return. I could see the character of Sherbert fitting in far better with a continuing Seymour third man but not with a returning Foggy.
I see what you mean, Unc, but he could have been brought back in one episode if Roy and Alan had wanted.